JUDGMENT The petitioner’s husband (2^nd respondent herein) availed a loan from the 1^st respondent bank after pledging certain gold ornaments. Going by the pleadings in the writ petition, there are certain matrimonial disputes between the petitioner and the 2^nd respondent and at the instance of the petitioner, O.P.No.89 of 2026 is pending before the Family Court, Aluva, seeking return of gold ornaments. The petitioner is before this Court apprehending that the gold ornaments, which are the subject matter of O.P.No.89 of 2026 before the Family Court, Aluva, will be sold by the 1^st respondent bank in auction, to the prejudice of the petitioner. It is submitted that if the Bank sells the gold for the purposes of recovering the amount due from the 2^nd respondent, the relief sought for before the Family Court will practically become infructuous.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank would submit, on instructions, that on account of the proceedings before the Family Court, Aluva, the proposed auction has been deferred. It is submitted that it is for the petitioner to seek appropriate orders from the Family Court, Aluva and that the Bank has no objection in accepting the a