Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. GOPINATH P., J
SREEDHARAN. V. N – Appellant
Versus
1 ARBITRATION @ EXECUTION INSPECTOR OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KOZHANCHERY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7224 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to bank recovery proceedings. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's view on maintainability and extensions. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition has been filed challenging the recovery proceedings initiated by the respondent bank to recover amounts due under credit facilities availed by the petitioner from the respondent bank.
2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank and having regard to the terms of Exhibit P1 judgment, I am of the view that this writ petition is not maintainable and the remedy of the petitioner, if at all, is to seek extension of time to comply with the directions issued by this Court in the judgment dated 30.06.2025 in W.P.(C) No.9924 of 2025.
Accordingly, reserving the right of the petitioner to seek extension of time to comply with the directions in W.P.(C)
No.9924 of 2025, the writ petition will stand dismissed.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
