SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
ANANTHAPURAM CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. T-184 – Appellant
Versus
KERALA COOPERATIVE ARBITRATION COURT – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.NISHA GEORGE, SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM (SR.), SMT.ANN MARIA FRANCIS
For the Respondents: SRI.V.A.VINOD, SMT. SILPA N.P (GP)

JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed challenging Exhibit P6 order of the Co-operative Arbitration Court, Thiruvananthapuram setting aside Exhibit P1 order of suspension issued by the petitioner-Society in respect of the 2nd respondent.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submits that the reliefs sought for in the writ petition have become infructuous as following disciplinary proceedings, the 2nd respondent has already been dismissed from service and those proceedings have been challenged separately by the 2nd respondent.

3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent, I am of the opinion that since the 2nd respondent has already been dismissed from service, the question of validity of her suspension and the direction to reinstate her in service by setting aside the order of suspension need not be gone into by this Court in this writ petition. The writ petition is therefore dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top