IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
UDIYANNOOR SHIVA TEMPLE TRUST – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
The 1st petitioner is a public temple trust, and the 2nd petitioner is stated to be the duly elected president of the 1st petitioner trust. The 1st petitioner is stated to have made a fixed deposit with the 4th respondent Society. The petitioners state that in the meeting of the managing committee on 18.01.2023, a decision was taken to withdraw the fixed deposit originally made with the 4th respondent Society and to deposit the same in the 6th respondent Bank. With that request, Exts.P1 and P2 are stated to have been filed before the 5th respondent. However, the 5th respondent – the Manager of the 4th respondent Society – informed the petitioners through Ext.P3 that, on the basis of certain complaints raised by some other members of the managing committee as regards the proposed transfer of the fixed deposit to the 6th respondent Bank, the 4th respondent Society is not in a position to transfer the afore fixed deposit. The petitioners state that, as directed in Ext.P3, they have complied with the requirements therein by producing the documents along with Ext.P4 letter dated
30.01.2023 addressed to the 5th respondent herein. Even thereafter, the petitioners complain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.