SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14038

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
VARGHESE P.M. – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOSEPH M.P.
For the Respondents: SRI.P.THOMAS GEEVERGHESE, SC, VENGOLA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, SRI. T.NAVEEN SC, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, SRI.TONY AUGUSTINE, G.P.

JUDGMENT

1. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that a defect has occurred in drafting the Writ Petition and sought permission to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition.

2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as stated above.

Sd/-

M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE Shg/

APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 7452 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE PROJECT REPORT BEARING PROJECT NO. 84 VBP 2020-21 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DRAIN IN BEDHANI THACHAKULAM W-13 (NOW W-14) IN DIVISION

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top