Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14040

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
HAR AUTO PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNNIKRISHNAN – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 3113 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.40891 OF 2024

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH, SHRI.E.MOHAMMED SHAFI, SRI.PRAJIT RATNAKARAN, SMT.GANGA A.SANKAR, SMT.KRISHNAPRIYA R., SMT.ANJU DONY
For the Respondents: SRI.P.S.APPU

The court emphasized the right of the petitioner to challenge a contested order despite the closure of the contempt case.

Headnote:The court analyzed the legality of an order passed in compliance with prior directions issued in WP

(C) No.40891 of 2024. The petitioner contended that the order violated the judgment. The court decided not to proceed in the contempt case, leaving open the petitioner's right to challenge the order. The final ruling stated that the contempt case is closed without prejudice regarding the petitioner's rights.

Table of Content
1. assessment of order compliance with a previous judgment. (Para 1)
2. ruling on the closure of the contempt case. (Para 2)

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the directions in the judgment dated 10.09.2025 in WP(C)

No.40891 of 2024, orders have been passed on 13.02.2026.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said order is illegal and contrary to the directions in the judgment.

After going through the order, I am not inclined to proceed further in this Contempt of Court case, and the same is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the order on all available grounds, if so advised.

SD/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14040

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JHAR AUTO PRIVATE LIMITED – AppellantVersusUNNIKRISHNAN – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 3113 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.40891 OF 2024

The court emphasized the right of the petitioner to challenge a contested order despite the closure of the contempt case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
HAR AUTO PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNNIKRISHNAN – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 3113 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.40891 OF 2024