IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
R.SASIDHARAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
P.P ROCKEY – Respondent
OP (MAC) NO. 13 OF 2026 | OPMV NO.1372 OF 2010
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed for procedural orders on deposited claims. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court finds deficiencies in affidavits, requires proper documentation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. the petition is disposed with directives for the tribunal. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
The original petition is filed with the following prayers:-
(i) issue a direction to the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Irinjalakuda, to act on Ext-P3-P6 memo’s and pass appropriate orders accepting Ext-P7 to P10 “one and same” affidavits and transfer the amounts in deposit to the petitioners as apportioned to them in O.P (M.V) 1372/2010.
(ii) issue such other order or direction as this honourable court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
2. This Court had directed the Registry to get a report from the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal concerned as to why Exts.P3 to P6 memos submitted by the claimants for transfer of the deposited amounts were not allowed.
3. Pursuant to the above order, a communication has been received dated 13.02.2026 stating that Exts.P7 to P10 affidavits produced by petitioners 1 to 4 cannot be treated as a solemn declaration relating to the subject matter in question, as there was no affirmation or swearing of the affidavit. There is also no proper verification in the affidavit. There is no reason stated for the discrepancy with regard to the address of the petitioners. Further, after the signature of the respective applicants, it is written as “What is known by these names in the same person/one's own house name/address” and below the same, the gazetted officer put his signature. It is also stated that there is no proper authentication by the person before whom the affidavit is sworn, and in the absence of due affirmation or swearing, verification and proper authentication/attestation, Exts.P7 to P10 cannot be treated as affidavits.
4. However, it is stated that if the petitioners represent Exts.P3 to P6 memos with the required documents directed to be produced or on production of a proper sworn affidavit and giving a sworn statement regarding the discrepancies in the address of the petitioners, the amount can be credited forthwith to the bank account of the respective petitioners.
5. The above statements are recorded.
6. On the petitioners complying with the same, the Tribunal will pass appropriate orders, without any further delay, remitting the amount to the bank account of the respective petitioners.
The Original petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.