IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
ABHIJITH N. DAS – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“i) To quash Ext.P4 and P5 by the issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction;
ii)To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the 2nd respondent to grant replacement sought by the petitioner relating to Exhibit P1 permit;
iii) To issue any other appropriate writ, direction or order which this Honourable Court deem fit in the circumstances of the case.
iv) To dispense with the filing of translation of vernacular documents;”
The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the application for replacement was considered and the same was allowed with effect from 13.02.2026. This is recorded.
Accordingly, nothing further remains to be considered in this writ petition, and the same is closed.
Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.