SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14044

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
HIRAN DAS MURALI – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 4734 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. C. DHEERAJ RAJAN, SRI. ANAND KALYANAKRISHNAN, SRI. LIBIN VARGHESE
For the Respondents: ADV. O.M.SHALINA, SMT. SURYA BINOY

Court mandates issuance of a Customized Police Clearance Certificate while restricting travel based on ongoing criminal cases.

Headnote:The petitioner challenges the denial of a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC) due to his involvement in criminal cases. The Court reviews previous orders and mandates the issuance of a Customized PCC, including case details. The petitioner is restricted from leaving the country without court permission.

Result: The writ petition is disposed of directing issuance of PCC.

Table of Content
1. petitioner requests pcc due to criminal case involvements. (Para 1)
2. respondent argues need for customized pcc. (Para 2)
3. court mandates issuance of pcc with case details. (Para 3)
4. travel restrictions applied for the petitioner. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved as the 1st respondent has not considered his request for a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC)

favourably.

2. The learned DSGI appearing for the 1st respondent would submit that the petitioner is involved in three criminal cases and therefore, only a Customised PCC can be issued, and that too only on orders from this Court.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned DSGI appearing for the 1st respondent, and having perused Ext.P2 order of this Court in B.A. No.9377 of 2025 dated 27.08.2025, Ext.P3 order of this Court in Crl.M.A. No.5 of 2025 in B.A.No.9377 of 2025 dated 03.11.2025 and Ext.P4 order of this Court in Crl.M.C. No.9448 of 2025 dated 30.10.2025, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to issue a Customized PCC to the petitioner also mentioning the details of the cases mentioned in Exts.P2 to P4 orders. The needful shall be done within two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

4. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not leave the country without getting express permission from the courts concerned in cases where no orders are granted permitting him to travel.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top