SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14046

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
SUMESH K.S – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6470 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR
For the Respondents: SMT.DEVI SHRI. R, GP.

Procedural fairness requires timely consideration of permit issuance by authorities following established procedure.

Headnote:In this writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct the respondent to issue a Regular Permit granted to the petitioner, the Court found that delay in issuance was due to the concerned officer being on leave. The Court ordered consideration of the issuance post-timings settlement within two months. The primary issue was the timely issuance of the permit and the Court's finding emphasized the necessity of adhering to procedural norms for permit issuance. The final outcome stipulated the authority's duty to act within the defined timeframe as delineated.

Table of Content
1. request for writ to issue transport permit. (Para 1)
2. delay in permit issuance due to official leave. (Para 2)
3. directive for prompt issuance of permit. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:

“i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondent to issue the Regular Permit already granted to the petitioner as per Ext.P1 immediately, on the route Kombanpara- Kannur-Kolithattu in respect of Stage Carriage KL-58/E 5654 with the proposed set of timings without prejudice to the right of the respondent to settle the timing objections if any, thereafter in the interest of justice;

ii)To issue any other appropriate writ, direction or order which this Hon’ble Court deem fit in the circumstances of the case.

iii)To dispense with the filing of translation of vernacular documents.”

2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the permit could not be issued after the settlement of timings only because the officer concerned was on leave.

3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent/competent authority to consider the issuance of a permit after settlement of timings in accordance with law, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top