SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14052

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
FLYJAC LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ERUMAPETTY POLICE STATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 32034 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: ADV. K.M. MUHAMMED HUSSAIN
For the Respondents: SMT. SURYA BINOY, SRI.S.KRISHNA MOORTHY, SRI.MANU GOVIND, SRI.A.JAYASANKAR

A writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn when the petitioner no longer perceives an immediate threat requiring court intervention.

Headnote:The petition filed under Rule XXX of the High Court Rules seeks protection of the petitioner's establishment from obstruction by respondents. The petitioner withdrew the petition due to the absence of immediate threats, with permission to file a fresh petition if necessary. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, providing a procedural safeguard.

Table of Content
1. petition for police protection due to threats. (Para 1)
2. court allows withdrawal of the petition. (Para 2)
3. writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-

i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing respondent No.1 to grant effective and adequate police protection to property of the petitioner’s establishment and the employees of petitioner from any threat or obstruction being caused by the respondents 4 and 5, their men or agents for the smooth functioning of Petitioner’s shop including the carrying out of the loading and unloading operations.

ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing respondent No.1 to enquire into the grievances put forward in Exhibits P5 and to take appropriate actions in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

iii) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper, in the interest of justice.

iv) Allow the Writ Petition.

v) To dispense with filing of the translation of Vernacular documents .

2. An interim order was passed by this Court on 26th August, 2025, granting protection.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition, contending that at present there is no threat and also seeks permission to file a fresh writ petition, if there is a fresh cause of action.

Permission is granted. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top