SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14053

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
AJOY L.S. – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PANATHAMTHITTA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 38100 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: ADV. PRASAD CHANDRAN
For the Respondents: SMT. DEVI SHRI.R, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Court held that existing orders on permit variation were satisfactory, thus closing the writ petition.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to a writ petition seeking mandamus to direct the first respondent to allow the application for variation of permit for the route Chengannur - Malappally as per prior orders stipulated in MVAA 57/2023. The Court noted that the orders have been passed, thus the petition is closed without prejudice to further challenges by the petitioner. The primary issues include the petitioner’s rights regarding permit variations and the corresponding responsibilities of the regional transport authority. The Court ultimately closed the petition based on confirmation of orders already issued.

Table of Content
1. seeking mandamus for permit variation rights. (Para 1)
2. court confirms satisfaction of issued orders, closing the petition. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-

i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction or order directing the 1st respondent to pass final orders as directed in MVAA 57/2023 by allowing the application for variation of permit submitted by the petitioner on the route Chengannur – Malappally in respect of his stage carriage under rule 130 of the Kerala Motor vehicles Rules by circulation of papers in the interest of justice forthwith or within a time limit ;

ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction or order directing the 1st respondent to allow the modified application submitted by the petitioner for variation of permit Exhibit P4 to operate the Chengannur-Malappally in respect of his stage carriage, and pass final orders in the interest of justice forthwith or within a time limit;

iii) to issue any other appropriate writ, direction or order which this Honourable Court deem fit in the circumstances of the case.

iv) to dispense with the translation of any vernacular documents if any.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the 1st respondent has already passed orders as directed in M.V.A.A. No.57 of 2023. This was recorded by this Court in the order dated 23.10.2025.

Accordingly, nothing remains to be considered in this Writ petition, and the same is closed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the said order, if aggrieved.

Sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top