Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
SUMY CHERIAN, SOMY CHACKO, SR. SOMINI THOMAS, RENJU MATHEW, JISHA ABRAHAM, BINOY SEBASTIAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's concern over non-approval of teachers during a ban period. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. court directed approval based on precedent judgments. (Para 5 , 8) |
| 3. court's directive for the consideration of representations. (Para 7 , 9) |
JUDGMENT Dated this the 26th day of February, 2026 The petitioners are Aided School Teachers working in various Schools coming under the management of Corporate Educational Agency, Diocese of Idukki.
2. Their original appointment was during the ban period against additional division vacancies available in their respective Schools and there were restrictions as part of economy measures as per G.O.(P) No.317/2005/G.Edn. But, later Government lifted the ban as per Ext.P7 G.O.(P) No.10/2010/G.Edn. and directed approval for the said period on condition that the Managers of the School have to execute a bond in terms of the said Government Order undertaking that the Managers will appoint equal number of protected Teachers as against the appointments made during the said period.
3. Since the 6th respondent-Corporate Manager has not executed a bond in terms of Ext.P7, the petitioners’ approval from initial date of appointment is not so far gra
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
