SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14069

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
VIJAYARAJAN K.T. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.C.VINCENT
For the Respondents: SMT.DEEPA V, ADV.T.K.AJITHKUMAR (V), ADV.SHERRY J THOMAS

ORDER

This review petition is filed to review the judgment dated

06.02.2026 in WP(C) No.4432/2026. The main contention of the petitioner is that even though this Court observed that coercive steps based on the proceedings under Section 13 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act shall be kept in abeyance, the same is not there in the judgment.

2. Heard the Government Pleader also.

3. I think there is force in the argument of the petitioner.

Therefore, an additional condition can be inserted in the judgment.

Therefore, this review petition is disposed of with following directions:

After condition No.4 in the concluding portion of the judgment dated 06.02.2026 in WP(C) No.4432/2026, the following condition is inserted.

5. No coercive steps shall be taken against the property of the petitioner based on Section 13 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act , till final orders are passed as directed above.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top