SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14070

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
KADEEJA – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.RENI JAMES, SHRI.MICHAEL.M.WILSON, SMT.T.A.MARY RINJU, SMT.C.R.REKHA
For the Respondents: SMT. VIDYA KURIAKOSE, SR, GP

ORDER

This review petition is filed to review the judgment dated

08.01.2026 in WP(C) No.31692/2025. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that instead of issuing a direction to the LLMC, this Court directed the authorised officer to consider the Form-5 application.

The counsel submitted that the judgment may be recalled.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

3. I think the judgment can be recalled and the writ petition can be heard afresh.

Therefore, this review petition is allowed. The judgment dated

08.01.2026 in WP(C) No.31692/2025 is recalled. The writ petition is restored to file.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top