Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
KADEEJA – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
RP NO. 207 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.31692 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition filed to reconsider judgment. (Para 1) |
| 2. counsel argues for direction amendment. (Para 2) |
| 3. court concludes to allow review. (Para 3) |
ORDER
This review petition is filed to review the judgment dated
08.01.2026 in WP(C) No.31692/2025. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that instead of issuing a direction to the LLMC, this Court directed the authorised officer to consider the Form-5 application.
The counsel submitted that the judgment may be recalled.
2. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.
3. I think the judgment can be recalled and the writ petition can be heard afresh.
Therefore, this review petition is allowed. The judgment dated
08.01.2026 in WP(C) No.31692/2025 is recalled. The writ petition is restored to file.
sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
