SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14080

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
DOMINI ML – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7299 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.HAMDAN MANSOOR K., SRI.P.B.SUNEER
For the Respondents: SR GP, SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

Court directed timely consideration of applications based on procedural reports.

Headnote:The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider Exts.P3 and P4 Form-5 applications in a fixed timeframe. The court determined to issue a direction for prompt consideration of the applications based on submitted reports, leading to a judgment on procedural expediency. The court ultimately ruled that the report from the 4th respondent must be reviewed and a decision made within stipulated months following receipt, ordering compliance with the judgment.

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek writ for timely application consideration. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court directed expedient handling of applications based on reports. (Para 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

“I. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondent no.1 to consider Ext.P3 & P4 submitted by the petitioners within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court and pass appropriate order.

II. Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” [SIC]

2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Exts.P3 and P4 Form–5 applications within a time frame.

3. Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Exts.P3 and P4 Form-5 applications within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 4th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on Exts.P3 and P4 Form-5 applications to the 1st respondent / Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 1st respondent / Authorised O directed to consider Exts.P3 and P4 Form-5 applications (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 4th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of five months from the date of receipt of the report.

3. The petitioners will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 1st and 4th respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE nvj

Judgment reserved NA
Date of judgment 26.02.2026
Judgment dictated 26.02.2026
Draft Judgment Placed 27.02.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded 28 .02.2026
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 7299 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top