IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
K.S BHARATHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER FORT KOCHI – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“I. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the 1st respondent to consider Exhibit P5 Form 6 Application and pass orders in it, within such time, as may be fixed by the Hon’ble Court.
II. Issue such other reliefs necessary in the nature of the case and in the ends of justice.
AND III. dispense with the production of documents in Malayalam (vernacular.” [SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P5 Form-6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P5 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on Ext.P5 Form-6 application to the 1st respondent / Authorised Officer within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.