IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MUHAMMED SHAFI PALAKKAL – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7363 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks reliefs for land application. (Para 1) |
| 2. court considers timely direction for application. (Para 2) |
| 3. court issues compliance directives to respondents. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“I. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exhibit-P2, application (in form number 7) dated 29.01.2026 submitted by the petitioner before the first respondent under section 27 A of the Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act , 2008 for using the land for other purposes within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon’ble court;
II. To dispense with the production of the English translation of the Exhibits which are in vernacular language;
and III. Issue such other writ, order or direction as this hon’ble court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext. P2 Form–7 application within a time frame.
3. Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 2nd and 3rd respondents are directed to submit the necessary reports based on Ext.P2 Form-7 application to the 1st respondent / Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 1st respondent / Authorised O directed to consider Ext.P2 Form-7 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the reports received from the 2nd and 3rd respondents, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the reports.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 1st, 2nd and
3rd respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE nvj
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 7363 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit-P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX PAID RECEIPT DATED 26.09.2024 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT.
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of judgment
26.02.2026
Judgment dictated
26.02.2026
Draft Judgment Placed
27.02.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded
28.02.2026
Exhibit-P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION (IN FORM NUMBER 7) DATED 29.01.2026 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT U/S 27 A OF THE Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act , 2008.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.