IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
RADHA AMMA – Appellant
Versus
SUB COLLECTOR/ REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER OTTAPALAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7373 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed seeking reliefs regarding application processing. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel for the petitioner expressed willingness for a directive. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directed timely processing of the application. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 1st respondent to consider Exhibit P2 application submitted by the petitioner, and to pass orders thereon in accordance with law within a reasonable time frame as fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
(ii) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of English Translation of the vernacular document filed in this writ petition on such terms and conditions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
(iii) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble court deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” [SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P2 Form–5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 Form-5 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 2nd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on Ext.P2 Form-5 application to the 1st respondent / Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 1st respondent / Authorised O directed to consider Ext.P2 Form-5 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 2nd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 1st and 2nd respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE nvj
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 7373 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 19/12/2025 ISSUED FROM THE VANIYAMKULAM I VILLAGE OFFICE IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER WITH NO.98824016 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of judgment
26.02.2026
Judgment dictated
26.02.2026
Draft Judgment Placed
27.02.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded
28 .02.2026
30/12/2025 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM NO.5 OF THE Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Rules ,2008 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.