IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
LOULY – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COLLECTOR (L R) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for mandamus to direct consideration of application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's directive for timely action on the petitioner's application. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P1 Form 5 application of the petitioner after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner within a time limit fixed by this Hon’ble Court;
ii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to remove petitioner’s property from data bank iii) Declare that the property of the petitioner lying in 13.27 Ares of property lying in Survey No.36/2 of Vengola village in Kunnathunad Taluk, Block No.20, Ernakulam District is not a paddy land.
iv) issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case.
V) Dispense with the production of English translation of the vernacular Exhibits produced in the Writ Petition [c]."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.