IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ANSAR HASSAN K.A. – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER MUVATTUPUZHA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) To issue a Writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order, or direction directing the 1st respondent or any officer authorised under the 1st respondent to consider and pass an order in Ext. P3 Form 6 application submitted by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible within a time period fixed by this Hon’ble Court;
ii) Dispense with the production of translation of vernacular documents;
iii) To grant such other and further reliefs as are just, proper, and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P3 Form - 6 application submitted by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.