SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14093

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ANSAR HASSAN K.A. – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER MUVATTUPUZHA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7519 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.V.N.HARIDAS, SHRI.SAIFUDEEN T.S, SMT.B.SHAMEERA, SMT.NIMISHAMOL SASIDHARAN
For the Respondents: SR GP – SMT. VIDYA KURIAKOSE

Timely consideration of applications under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act is essential for effective administration of justice.

Headnote:The Writ Petition seeks a mandamus directing the first respondent to expeditiously consider the Ext.P3 application under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008. The court finds merit in the petition and directs timely consideration of the application.

Result: The 3rd respondent must report to the 2nd respondent within one month, and the 2nd respondent must decide on the application within four months.

Table of Content
1. prayer for direction to consider application (Para 1 , 2)
2. court hears both sides (Para 3)
3. timely consideration mandated (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

"i) To issue a Writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order, or direction directing the 1st respondent or any officer authorised under the 1st respondent to consider and pass an order in Ext. P3 Form 6 application submitted by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible within a time period fixed by this Hon’ble Court;

ii) Dispense with the production of translation of vernacular documents;

iii) To grant such other and further reliefs as are just, proper, and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case."

[SIC]

2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P3 Form - 6 application submitted by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P3 application to the 2nd respondent/Authorised Officer within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 2nd respondent/Authorised O directed to consider the Ext.P3 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 2nd respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd and 3rd respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top