IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SANOJ CTP – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER MALAPPURAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7598 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seeks a writ directing application processing. (Para 1) |
| 2. counsel requests for timely application consideration. (Para 2) |
| 3. court directs timely report submission and consideration. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P2, within a time period of two weeks;
ii. Declare that the application in Form 5, Exhibit P2, is liable to be disposed of without any delay;
iii. Command the 1st respondent to order removal of the land covered by Exhibit P1 from the data bank, as applied in Exhibit P2, within two weeks;
iv. Exempt the petitioner from producing the English Translation of Malayalam Exhibits produced along with this writ petition and the petitioners further undertakes that they are ready and willing to produce English Translation of Malayalam documents as and when required;
v. Issue any other writ order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case;
(SIC)
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P2 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 application within a time frame. Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 2nd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P2 application to the 1st respondent/Authorised O expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 1st respondent/Authorised O to consider Ext.P2 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 2nd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before respondents 1 and
2 for compliance.
sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE JV
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 7598 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT FOR THE YEARS 2025-2026 DATED 22.01.2026 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM 5 HAVING APPLICATION NO. 3/2026/262799 DATED
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of Judgment
26.02.2026
Judgment dictated
26.02.2026
Draft Judgment placed
27.02.2026
Final Judgment uploaded
28.02.2026
29.01.2026 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT IN WP(C) NO.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.