IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
VISHNU B.S – Appellant
Versus
SRI. SAUNDARA PANDYAN P.K. – Respondent
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
The present contempt petition has been filed alleging non compliance with the Judgment dated 03.03.2025 passed in O.P.(CAT) No.200 of 2023 whereby this Court had disposed of the original petition with the following directions.
“ We thus, dispose of the petition by modifying the order under challenge, noticing the fact that the ratio has been reduced and the chances of inter divisional transfer have increased. The respondents will take a call on the matter when the training is over, considering the request of all the petitioners as well as similarly situated Assistant Loco Pilots or Senior Assistant Loco Pilots working in various divisions for Inter-divisional Transfer, as expeditiously as possible.”
2. The respondents have produced a memo along with order dated 16.02.2026 complying with the order of this Court as well as taking decision as under; “ In view of the above factual position, the following decision is hereby taken;
a. That relief shall be granted to IDT applicants upon availability of replacement manpower.
b. That the replacement manpower is now materializing through the allotment of 64 RRB Pro-ALP papers to Palakkad Division, and PCEE has app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.