SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14109

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
K.K.USHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WA NO. 24 OF 2022|WP(C) NO.3126 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, SRI.M.D.SASIKUMARAN, SHRI.PRAVEEN S., SHRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G, SRI.DIPU JAMES, SHRI.MATHEW K.T., SHRI.GEORGE K.V.
For the Respondents: None listed

The Court allows withdrawal of a Writ Appeal with liberty to seek future recourse based on legislative amendments.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the withdrawal of a Writ Appeal where appellants requested to approach authorities after proposed amendments to rules. The Court allows the appeal to be withdrawn, emphasizing potential future recourse if amendments are favorable. The final ruling specifies that the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach authorities.

JUDGMENT SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, J After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellants seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the Writ Appeal with liberty to approach the authorities, in case the proposed amendment in the Rules notified subsequently are in his favour.

Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon