IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
AKHILA KERALA TRINAMOOL PARTY – Appellant
Versus
THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA – Respondent
WA NO. 520 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.46288 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ appeal filed under section 5 concerning timely order on appeal. (Para 1) |
| 2. appellate decision rendered as infructuous. (Para 2) |
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
The present writ appeal has been filed under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958 challenging the judgment dated 05.01.2026 whereby the writ petition was disposed of, directing the 1st respondent to pass appropriate orders on Ext.P10 appeal within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.
2. According to the prayer clause in the writ petition, there was a prayer with regard to calling of the records, and the 2nd prayer was to dispose of the appeal pending before the competent authority within a time frame. The appeal has already been decided by the 1st respondent vide Annexure-A1 order dated 02.02.2026. In the writ petition, the order under challenge is Ext.P14 against which the appeal was preferred. Now the appeal has been decided, and thereby the order Ext.P14 stands merged with the appellate order.
Accordingly, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ appeal, the same is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. However, the appellant would be at liberty to assail the appellate order, if so advised.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.