IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
DR. PHEBE JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Judgment Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
1. The present intra-court appeal under Section 5 of the High Court Act , 1958 assails the judgment dated 16.12.2024 passed in WP(c) No.23698 of 2024 whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the Writ Petition.
FACTS
2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant/petitioner had filed the Writ Petition claiming the following reliefs: i) to issue a writ of certiorari quashing Ext.P7 as unjust, illegal and arbitrary;
ii) To issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to refix the pay scale of the petitioner, by considering the initial 5 years of service in the post of Junior Scientist;
iii) To declare that the petitioner is entitled to be refixed in the post of Scientist considering the initial 5 years of the petitioner’s service;
iv) To issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to refix the post of the applicant in the post of Scientist considering the initial 5 years of the petitioner’s service;
v) To declare that the petitioner is entitled to get her pay scale fixed by refixing her appointment as sought for in prayers No.(iii) and (iv) above;
vi) To issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to fix the pay scal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.