SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14112

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
SURESH BABU T. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N.RAGHURAJ (SR.)
For the Respondents: M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, K.JOHN MATHAI, JOSON MANAVALAN, KURYAN THOMAS, SUNIL KUMAR KURIAKOSE, JAI MOHAN

Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.

No one appears for the appellants. Moreover, notice was issued in the year of 2018, however, thereafter, the appellants does not take any steps to serve the notice on the respondents.

It appears that the appellants as well as the learned Counsel for the appellants have lost interest in prosecuting this writ appeal. Accordingly, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top