Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
WINCOST KURIES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SAJEEVAN – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 658 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to lower court's rejection of additional documents (Para 1) |
| 2. upholding the non-disclosure policy in commercial suits (Para 2) |
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has challenged an order whereby the Court below has rejected permission to produce additional documents. The suit is a commercial suit. After the amendment of Order XI of the Code of Civil Procedure for Commercial Disputes, all original documents are to be produced along with the suit, along with a Statement of Truth. This was not done.
The documents were sought to be produced later.
2. The court held that, in commercial suits, this cannot be permitted since there is non-disclosure of all vital aspects regarding the suit, at the stage of filing the suit. There is no legal infirmity in the order.
Original petition fails and is dismissed.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
