SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14117

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
KALLADA TOURS AND TRAVELS (REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SURESH KUMAR K.R.) – Appellant
Versus
HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2588 OF 2025|MA(ARB.) NO.9 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G.HARIHARAN, K.S.SMITHA, B.R.SINDU, V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, AFNA V.P., V.ROHITH
For the Respondents: P.PAULOCHAN ANTONY, G.VISWANATHAN, S.NIKHIL RAJEEV, ASWNI M.P., JOSEPH LIJO, SREEJITH K.

Closure of a Section 9 application renders original petitions moot, ensuring parties retain their rights.

Headnote:This judgment analyses the implications of the closure of a Section 9 application, determining that the original petition is closed without prejudice to either party's rights. The court framed the question of whether the closure of such an application affects the continuance of the petition. It found that no further proceedings can be carried out in the original petition post closure. Thus, the original petition is concluded, leaving parties entitled to pursue other appropriate remedies.

JUDGMENT

When the case is taken up, it is submitted that Section

9 application has itself been closed. Hence nothing survives in this original petition and this original petition is closed without prejudice to the right of either of the parties.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top