SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14119

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
SANITHA B – Appellant
Versus
RATHEESH V – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.KRISHNAKUMAR

O R D E R

The transfer petition has been filed seeking transfer of O.P. No.891 of 2024 on the file of the Family Court, Nedumangad to the Family Court, Punalur.

2. Even though notice was taken out to the respondent on two occasions, it has been returned stating that addressee refused to accept the notice. In the above circumstances, service is treated as sufficient and it is presumed that the respondent is not having any objection regarding the prayer made in the petition.

In the above circumstances, the transfer petition is allowed. O.P. No.891 of 2024 on the file of the Family Court, Nedumangad stands transferred to the Family Court, Punalur.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top