SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14125

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
P.BABU – Appellant
Versus
KOZHIKODE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 29 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.G.JAYASHANKAR, SMT.P.K.RESHMA (KALARICKAL), SMT.REVATHY P. MANOHARAN, SMT.STEFIN THOMAS
For the Respondents: SHRI.V.KRISHNA MENON, GP- NIMA JACOB

The court enforces a municipal decision regarding the naming of a road, ensuring compliance with prior agreements.

Headnote:This judgment arises from a writ petition seeking the implementation of decisions made by the Kozhikode Municipal Corporation regarding the naming of a road. The Court had previously directed the Corporation to comply with these decisions. It is determined that the interim order to implement the name change is made absolute. The Corporation is directed to comply with prior commitments. The final decision ensures that the orders issued in this regard are enforced without delay.

Table of Content
1. request for municipal compliance on road naming. (Para 1 , 2)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the respondents to implement the decisions taken vide Exts.P1, P2, P4 and P5, wherein the respondent Corporation has taken a decision to name the Mini-bypass-Puthiyapalam Road as ‘Puliyarangattu Chathappan Road’. The petitioner submits that in spite of the specific decision taken by the respondent Corporation, no steps have been taken to implement the same.

2. When the matter came up for consideration on 18.01.2021, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent Municipal Corporation submitted that a decision had already been taken by them to put up a Board with petitioner’s father’s name on it and sought some time to put up the said Board and the Court adjourned the matter by three weeks.

In the light of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, making the interim order dated 18.01.2021 absolute, with a further direction to the respondent Corporation to comply with the undertaking in the said interim order, if not already complied.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sm/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top