SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14135

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
JAMNA JIKKI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 27073 OF 2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.JATHIN DAS
For the Respondents: N.NANDAKUMARA MENON (SR.), P.K.MANOJKUMAR

The court reinforced the duty of local authorities to act against illegal encroachments upon public property within a specified timeframe.

Headnote:In this case, the petitioner sought directions for the eviction of encroachers from a public road, presenting evidence including complaints and reports detailing illegal occupation. The Court found significant reports about encroachment and ordered the Secretary of the local authority to take action, ensuring compliance within six months. The final outcome emphasized timely action against encroachments.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks eviction of encroachers. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court orders action against encroachment. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to respondents 2 to 5 to take appropriate action to evict the illegal encroachers from the public road within a time limit to be fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner submits that due to the encroachment on the road maintained by the respondent Corporation, the petitioner is finding it difficult to enter into the property owned by her having an extent 66 cents. Thereupon Ext.P4 complaint was preferred before the District Collector and based on the direction issued, Ext.P5 report was filed by the Village Officer, wherein it is reported that almost 14 families have encroached upon the said road and constructed hutment. Thereafter by Ext.P7, the petitioner was informed that direction has already been issued to the respondent Corporation to evict the encroachers. The petitioner submits that thereafter no action was taken. Thereupon Ext.P8 application under Right to Information Act regarding the action taken for evicting the encroachment was submitted by the petitioner, to which Ext.P9 reply has been given to the effect that the Secretary of the respondent Corporation was directed to take steps to evict the encroachment. Thereafter, no steps have been taken in this regard.

3. As per the documents produced along with the writ petition it is seen that based on Ext.P4 complaint preferred by the petitioner before the District Collector, Ext.P5 report was filed wherein it is categorically stated that 14 families have encroached upon the road and they have constructed hutment and are residing there and Exts.P7 and P9 proceedings would reveal that necessary direction has been issued to the Secretary of the respondent Corporation to take appropriate steps in this regard.

4. Taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances and after hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation and the learned Government Pleader, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition as follows:

The 3rd respondent Secretary of the local authority shall take appropriate steps pursuant to Exts.P7 and P9 communications and take appropriate action in accordance with law, with notice to the petitioner and the alleged encroachers. The proceedings shall be finalised within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top