SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14136

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
GEETHA KUMARI AMMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 27872 OF 2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.SUDHEESHKAR, C.UNNIKRISHNAN
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI

The court directs verification and resolution of encroachments on land following party claims, emphasizing lawful occupation.

Headnote:The petitioner's writ is for the removal of encroachments on puramboke land by the respondents. The respondents have asserted they removed the encroachments, leading the court to find the petition unnecessary. The court directs an inspection by the 6th respondent to verify compliance. The primary issue was the petition's merit against unlawful occupation. The court affirmed its decision based on the parties' assertions that encroachments had been cleared.

Result: The writ petition is closed with directions to inspect.

Table of Content
1. court addresses the encroachment issue on puramboke land. (Para 1 , 2)

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up for consideration there is no appearance for the petitioner.

2. The above writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondents 1 to 5 to remove the encroachment and illegal occupation of puramboke land. As per the averment in the writ petition, the encroachment was done by respondents 7 and 8. The learned counsel appearing for respondents 7 and 8 submits that while the writ petition is pending consideration, they have removed all the encroachments and therefore, the writ petition has become practically infructuous.

Taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances, I am inclined to close the writ petition with a direction to the 6th respondent to conduct an inspection and verify whether the encroachments have been removed by respondents 7 and 8 and if not, take appropriate action in accordance with law.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sm/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top