IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
NITHYA MOL K.S. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the proposed donor of Sri.Rameshan P., who is a patient undergoing treatment for liver disease at Meitra Hospital, Kozhikode.
2. The husband of the petitioner and the son of the patient are close friends and were working together in a bakery. Since the liver of the close relatives of the patient is not suitable for transplantation, the petitioner came forward and informed her readiness to donate a part of her liver to him. Since they are not close relatives, they have submitted joint application as evidenced by Ext.P10 Form 3 application and Ext.P11 Form 11 application, along with Ext.P1 altruism certificate and necessary documents, to refer the matter to the first respondent for getting necessary approval for unrelated organ transplantation. However, the joint application submitted by the petitioners was rejected by Ext.P12. Aggrieved by this, the petitioner has approached this Court with the above writ petition.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, Ext.P12 is a cryptic order, which does not contain any valid or cogent reason for the rejection of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.