Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14141

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
P.V. SAMEERA – Appellant
Versus
P.V. KUNHAYISHA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35716 OF 2019

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI, SRI.V.A.SATHEESH
For the Respondents: SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH, SRI. SHAMEER P M

Withdrawal of a writ petition is accepted by the court, leading to its dismissal.

Headnote:In the judgment of WP

(C) NO. 35716 OF 2019, the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition which was noted by the Court. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The ruling reflects that a voluntary withdrawal by the petitioner leads to dismissal without further proceedings.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.

The said submission is recorded, and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGE

STB

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14141

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JP.V. SAMEERA – AppellantVersusP.V. KUNHAYISHA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 35716 OF 2019

Withdrawal of a writ petition is accepted by the court, leading to its dismissal.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
P.V. SAMEERA – Appellant
Versus
P.V. KUNHAYISHA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35716 OF 2019