SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14160

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
..... . – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ, SHRI.SUMEEN S.
For the Respondents: ADV SHRI.AJOY VENU SR. PP, ADV. SMT. BINDU.O.V

O R D E R

(Dated this the 25th day of February, 2026)

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, in this case, the petitioner was already acquitted by the trial Court and as such, this Crl.M.C became infructuous.

Accordingly, this Crl.M.C is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top