Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14160

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
..... . – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA. – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 6637 OF 2021

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ, SHRI.SUMEEN S.
For the Respondents: ADV SHRI.AJOY VENU SR. PP, ADV. SMT. BINDU.O.V

A case is rendered infructuous when the petitioner has already been acquitted, leading to dismissal of the appellate motion.

Headnote:The petitioner's counsel asserted the petitioner’s prior acquittal by the trial court rendered the present Criminal Miscellaneous Case infructuous. The court determined that the case was indeed rendered infructuous due to this acquittal, leading to the dismissal of the Crl.M.C. The final order was for dismissal as infructuous.

O R D E R

(Dated this the 25th day of February, 2026)

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, in this case, the petitioner was already acquitted by the trial Court and as such, this Crl.M.C became infructuous.

Accordingly, this Crl.M.C is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14160

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J..... . – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA. – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 6637 OF 2021

A case is rendered infructuous when the petitioner has already been acquitted, leading to dismissal of the appellate motion.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
..... . – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA. – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 6637 OF 2021