Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ASIF – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of petition under section 482 (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the lack of evidence for charges (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 3. court's ruling to quash proceedings (Para 8 , 9) |
O R D E R Dated this the 25th day of February, 2026 The accused in CC. No.923/2022 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, arising out of Crime No.598/2022 of Adoor Police Station, filed this petition under Section 482 of Cr.PC, praying for quashing all further proceedings against him. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 294 (b) and 506(i) of IPC .
2. The prosecution case is that on 20.4.2022 at about 3 p.m., the accused, alleging that the defacto complainant has received excess amount for encumbrance certificate at the Akshaya Centre, where the defacto complainant was working, abused her using filthy words and intimidated her.
3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the allegations levelled against the petitioner does not constitute the offences punishable under Section 294 (b) and 506(i) of IPC . Therefore, he prayed for quashing all further proceedings the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
