Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.M.SUNIL
For the Respondents: SRI.LIJU. M.P, SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K.

An absence of client instructions leads to automatic dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution.

Headnote:The court addressed the matter concerning RSA No. 116 of 2011, where the learned counsel for the appellant indicated a lack of instructions from the client. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. The key issue centered on the legal propriety of proceeding without representation. The judgment concluded with a directive to dismiss the appeal.

JUDGMENT

When the matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that no instructions are received from his client.

Hence, the R.S.A is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

EASWARAN S, JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :