SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14171

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
SARATH RAJAN – Appellant
Versus
S. MURALIDHARAN – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 372 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.38861 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.A.R.DILEEP

Compliance with previous court directives suffices to close contempt proceedings.

Headnote:The Court examined the compliance with its prior directions in the contempt case filed by the petitioner against the respondent. The counsel for both parties indicated that the directions issued by the Court had been followed, leading to the conclusion of the case. The Court decided to close the contempt case based on the acknowledged compliance.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for both sides submit that the directions issued by this Court have already been complied with.

In view of the afore, this Con.Case(C) would stand closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top