SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14173

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
VINIL P – Appellant
Versus
PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON
For the Respondents: SRI. BINOY VASUDEVAN, SC

JUDGMENT

Heard T.C.Suresh Menon, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Binoy Vasudevan, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Municipality.

2. The prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition is for a direction to the respondent Municipality to consider his request for a revised building permit, which has not been considered by the Municipality.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for the Municipality, on the basis of instructions received, submits that the Municipality is ready to consider the application on the basis of the revised Master Plan. The learned counsel for the petitioner also adds that the Municipality has already taken a decision to relax the restrictions.

4. In view of the afore, this writ petition would stand disposed of, directing the Secretary of the respondent Municipality to take note of the petitioner’s application for revised building permit and to take a decision thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of eight weeks. Needless to say, the petitioner shall also be granted an opportunity of being heard.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top