Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14182

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
KABEER M. A., SHABID M. A., SHEFIN M. A., K.N. BALAGANGATHARAN – Appellant
Versus
THE CONVENOR, TRAFFIC REGULATORY COMMITTEE, NELLIKUZHY GRAMAPANCHAYATH – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 28079 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SACHIN RAMESH
For the Respondents: SRI.K.S.ARUN KUMAR, SRI.P.V.ELIAS, SRI.N.N.ELAYATH, SRI.N.B.SUNIL NATH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

A writ petition may be dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioners fail to appear in court during the hearing.

Headnote:The writ petition was dismissed due to non-prosecution as neither the petitioners nor their counsel appeared in court. The decision was made after hearing the matter on 25.02.2026. The court recognized established procedures regarding the prosecution of cases.

J U D G M E N T

There is no representation for the petitioners. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE

anm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14182

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JKABEER M. A., SHABID M. A., SHEFIN M. A., K.N. BALAGANGATHARAN – AppellantVersusTHE CONVENOR, TRAFFIC REGULATORY COMMITTEE, NELLIKUZHY GRAMAPANCHAYATH – RespondentWP(C) NO. 28079 OF 2023

A writ petition may be dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioners fail to appear in court during the hearing.

Headnote:The writ petition was dismissed due to non-prosecution as neither the petitioners nor their counsel appeared in court. The decision was made after hearing the matter on 25.02.2026. The court recognized established procedures regarding the prosecution of cases.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
KABEER M. A., SHABID M. A., SHEFIN M. A., K.N. BALAGANGATHARAN – Appellant
Versus
THE CONVENOR, TRAFFIC REGULATORY COMMITTEE, NELLIKUZHY GRAMAPANCHAYATH – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 28079 OF 2023