SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14188

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
RAJEENA S. – Appellant
Versus
THE JOINT SECRETARY CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION-II – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.), SMT.ASHA BABU, SMT.AMMU CHARLES, SHRI.M.MANOJ KUMAR (CHELAKKADAN), SRI.S.M.PRASANTH, SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ
For the Respondents: SRI.K.JAJU BABU (SR.), SHRI.T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH, SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI, SHRI.SREELAL N.WARRIER, SMT.G. SHEEBA

JUDGMENT

1. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. Last time also, the counsel for the petitioner was absent.

2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top