SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14188

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
RAJEENA S. – Appellant
Versus
THE JOINT SECRETARY CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION-II – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 28198 OF 2013



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.), SMT.ASHA BABU, SMT.AMMU CHARLES, SHRI.M.MANOJ KUMAR (CHELAKKADAN), SRI.S.M.PRASANTH, SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ
For the Respondents: SRI.K.JAJU BABU (SR.), SHRI.T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH, SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI, SHRI.SREELAL N.WARRIER, SMT.G. SHEEBA

Failure to appear in court despite prior absence leads to dismissal of writ petitions for default.

Headnote:This judgment analyzes the applicability of procedural laws concerning the absence of counsel during proceedings. The petitioner, RAJEENA S., challenged various educational authorities but failed to appear on multiple occasions. The court determined that the absence warranted a dismissal of the petition. Central to the case were issues of procedural adherence and representation in court. The court underscored the importance of timely appearance, resulting in the dismissal of the writ petition for default.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's absence leads to dismissal. (Para 1)
2. court dismisses writ for default. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

1. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. Last time also, the counsel for the petitioner was absent.

2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top