IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHEEBA BABU – Appellant
Versus
THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“i) issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash Ext.P4 and Ext.P5 orders, after calling for the records leading to its issuance;
ii) issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents not to proceed with coercive steps against the petitioners and their building without complying with the provisions of Kerala Municipality Act ;
iii) petitioners also pray that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dispense with production of translation of the documents produced in vernacular language;
&
iv) issue such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
(SIC)
2. The petitioners are challenging Ext.P5 order passed in accordance to Section 406 (3) of the Kerala Municipality Act , 1994 (for short ‘Act 1994’). Ext.P5 is an order dated 27.11.2025. The short point raised by the petitioners is that, even though Ext.P4 provisional order is issued, no show cause notice is issued in accordance to (2) of the Act 1994. Hence, this writ petition is filed.
3. Heard, the learned counsel appearing fo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.