Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14230

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
JASMINE SHAMSU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6968 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.R.S.KALKURA, SHRI.M.S.KALESH, SRI.HARISH GOPINATH, SRI.H.KIRAN, SRI.P.I.NAJUMAL HUSSAIN
For the Respondents: SRI. RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE, GP

Court allows withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to file afresh.

Headnote:The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition, requesting liberty to file a fresh application. The court acknowledged this request and dismissed the current writ petition as withdrawn, reserving the liberty for future action. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as per the order dated 24th February 2026.

Table of Content
1. request for withdrawal of petition recognized. (Para 1)
2. court dismisses petition as withdrawn. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to file a fresh one.

2. Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14230

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JJASMINE SHAMSU – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 6968 OF 2026

Court allows withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to file afresh.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
JASMINE SHAMSU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6968 OF 2026