Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14234

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SUNIL.S. – Appellant
Versus
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRIVENKATESHA HEAVY EQUIPMENTS – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 36461 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.O.D.SIVADAS
For the Respondents: SMT.K.KRISHNA, SHRI.ACHYUTH MENON, SHRI. V. HARISANKAR, SMT. AMMINIKUTTY K., SR.GP

Settlement between parties renders writ petition infructuous, leading to dismissal.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the settlement between the parties, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous. The court emphasizes the resolution achieved by both sides, culminating in the termination of the case. Final ruling states that the writ petition is dismissed without further proceedings.

Table of Content
1. settlement between parties leads to dismissal of the case. (Para 1)
2. writ petition dismissed as infructuous. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing on either side submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties.

2. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14234

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JSUNIL.S. – AppellantVersusTHE MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRIVENKATESHA HEAVY EQUIPMENTS – RespondentWP(C) NO. 36461 OF 2025

Settlement between parties renders writ petition infructuous, leading to dismissal.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SUNIL.S. – Appellant
Versus
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRIVENKATESHA HEAVY EQUIPMENTS – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 36461 OF 2025