The court held that the petitioner retains the right to pursue statutory remedies against the revoked consent order.

O R D E R

Petitioner seeks review of the judgment dated 19.12.2025 in W.P. (C) No.43811/2025. As per that judgment, this Court permitted the petitioner to make a fresh application seeking issuance of 'consent to operate' and the same was directed to be considered. 2. Now, in this review, the petitioner would contend that the petitioner has got a remedy by way of an appeal against Ext.P8 Order, which revoked the consent to operate. Petitioner wants to pursue the said appellate remedy.

3. Learned Standing Counsel for the Pollution Control Board would also submit that, in case, a fresh application has to be considered by the Pollution Control Board, all the formalities contemplated by law, will have to be followed.

4. In the circumstances, the judgment above referred will stand reviewed and recalled. Instead, the Writ Petition will stand dismissed, reserving the right of the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies, if any, as against Ext.P8 Order of revocation.

The review petition is allowed as indicated above.

Sd/-