IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
NARAYANAN T.V. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA. – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 622 OF 2026|CC NO.2010 OF 2024|CRIME NO.358/2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks quashing based on amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. quashing necessary to maintain harmony and prevent abuse. (Para 6) |
| 3. court allows petition, quashing all proceedings. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
(Dated this the 24th day of February, 2026)
This is a petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. , by the accused in Crime No.358 of 2024 of Nileswar Police Station, Kasaragod, which is pending as CC. No.2010 of 2024 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Hosdurg. The offences alleged against the petitioner is under Sections 451 , 354 and 506 IPC .
2. The prosecution case as revealed from the FIR is that, on
27.05.2024 at about 4.00 p.m., the accused trespassed into the residence of the de facto complainant, intimidated to do away with her and outraged her modesty by holding her hand and thereby, he is alleged to have committed the aforesaid offences.
3. According to the petitioner, the dispute has been amicably settled with the defacto complainant/victim/ respondent No.2 and that she agreed to drop all further proceedings relating to the above dispute. Therefore, the petitioner prayed for quashing all further proceedings against him.
4. The de facto complainant/victim filed affidavit endorsing the averments in the Criminal MC. According to her, the case has been amicably settled and that she does not intend to proceed with the case and also that further proceedings in the case can be quashed. She has no further grievance against the petitioner.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor, after getting instruction from the investigating officer also submitted that the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties and that the victim is not interested in continuing the prosecution against the petitioners.
6. Considering the fact that the offences involved in this case are not heinous and very serious, but purely of private in nature and now the dispute has been settled between the parties, quashment of the same is necessary for maintaining harmonious relationship between the parties and also to prevent abuse of process of the court.
7. In the result, this Crl. M.C is allowed. All further proceedings against the petitioner in CC. No.2010 of 2024 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Hosdurg, arising from Crime No.358 of 2024 of Nileswar Police Station, Kasaragod, is quashed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.