SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14246

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. Pratheep Kumar, J
Vishnu – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 699 OF 2026|CC NO.668 OF 2025|CRIME NO.626/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.Krishnanunni G.B.
For the Respondents: Shri.Ajith M. Jiji, Shri.Breez.M.S.

The court quashed proceedings under IPC Section 498-A due to amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the non-heinous nature of disputes.

Headnote:This case involves a petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. concerning proceedings under Section 498-A r/w Section 34 of IPC alleging cruelty related to dowry. The petitioners, relatives of the husband, sought quashment due to a settlement with the complainant. The court noted that the complainant endorsed the settlement and indicated non-interest in prosecution. Given the non-heinous nature of the dispute, the court quashed all proceedings for maintaining harmony.

Result: Crl. M.C is allowed; further proceedings quashed.

Table of Content
1. petition for quashment of proceedings due to settlement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. affidavit confirms non-interest in prosecution. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court emphasizes necessity for maintaining harmony. (Para 6)

O R D E R

(Dated this the 24th day of February, 2026)

This is a petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. , by the accused Nos.1 to 4 in Crime No.626 of 2024 of Chathannoor Police Station, Kollam, which is pending as CC. No.668 of 2025 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Paravur. The offence alleged against the petitioners is under Section 498-A r/w Section 34 of IPC .

2. The prosecution case is that the 1st accused being the husband of the defacto complainant and the other accused being his relatives subjected her to cruelty both physically and mentally on the ground of dowry and thereby they are alleged to have committed the aforesaid offence.

3. According to the petitioners, the dispute has been settled with the defacto complainant/victim/ respondent No.2 and she agreed to drop all further proceedings relating to the above dispute. Therefore, the petitioners prayed for quashing all further proceedings against them.

4. The defacto complainant/victim filed affidavit endorsing the averments in the Criminal MC. According to her, the case has been amicably settled and that she does not intend to proceed with the case and also that all further proceedings in the case can be quashed. She has no further grievance against the petitioners.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor, after getting instruction from the investigating officer also submitted that the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties and that the victim is not at all interested in continuing the prosecution against the petitioners.

6. Considering the fact that the offence involved in this case is not heinous and very serious, but purely a matrimonial and private dispute, which has been amicably settled between the parties, quashment of further proceedings is necessary for maintaining harmonious relationship between the parties. 7. In the result, this Crl. M.C is allowed. All further proceedings against the petitioners in CC. No.668 of 2025 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Paravur, arising from Crime No.626 of 2024 of Chathannoor Police Station, Kollam, stands quashed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top