IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
MEGHA THANKACHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
O R D E R
(Dated this the 24th day of February, 2026)
The de facto complainant in Crime No.508 of 2025 of Hill Palace Police Station, filed this Crl.M.C under Section 528 BNSS praying for quashing all further proceedings against the 2nd respondent/accused in the above crime.
2. The above crime was registered under Section 31 (1)
of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act . The allegation in the above case is that, the accused, who is the husband of the de facto complainant between 1.15 p.m. on 23.05.2025 and 9.30 p.m. on 25.05.2025, voluntarily caused hurt to the de facto complainant and intimidated her, in violation of the protection order passed by Jurisdictional Magistrate.
4. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the entire dispute between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent is settled. They are now living happily and therefore, she prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the 2nd respondent.
5. Since it is submitted that the entire dispute between the parties is settled and now the petitioner is living along with the 2nd respondent, there is no meaning in continuing the proceedings against the 2nd respondent and as such, this Crl.M.C is li
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.