IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MIRSHAD.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks liberty to withdraw this Criminal Miscellaneous Case, but by reserving the right of the petitioner to file an application for discharge before the jurisdictional court. I find the above submission to be reasonable and justifiable.
In the aforesaid circumstances, I dismiss the Crl.M.C as withdrawn, but by reserving the right of the petitioner to raise all his contentions before the jurisdictional Court, including filing an application for discharge, provided charges have not been framed till date. If such an application is filed, the Trial Court is directed to consider and dispose of the application for discharge in accordance with law.
Sd/-
Srs/24.02.2026 C.S.DIAS, JUDGE APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 861 OF 2026 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure I A TRUE COPY OF THE CRIME AND OCCURRENCE REPORT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE JFCM COURT, SULTHAN BATHERY IN CONNECTION WITH CRIME NO.82/2025 OF SULTHAN BATHERY EXCISE RANGE ON
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.