SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14265

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MIRSHAD.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri.G.HARIHARAN, SRI.PRAVEEN.H, SMT.K.S.SMITHA, SRI.V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, SMT.AFNA V.P, SRI.V.ROHITH
For the Respondents: SR.PP.SMT.SEETHA

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks liberty to withdraw this Criminal Miscellaneous Case, but by reserving the right of the petitioner to file an application for discharge before the jurisdictional court. I find the above submission to be reasonable and justifiable.

In the aforesaid circumstances, I dismiss the Crl.M.C as withdrawn, but by reserving the right of the petitioner to raise all his contentions before the jurisdictional Court, including filing an application for discharge, provided charges have not been framed till date. If such an application is filed, the Trial Court is directed to consider and dispose of the application for discharge in accordance with law.

Sd/-

Srs/24.02.2026 C.S.DIAS, JUDGE APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 861 OF 2026 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure I A TRUE COPY OF THE CRIME AND OCCURRENCE REPORT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE JFCM COURT, SULTHAN BATHERY IN CONNECTION WITH CRIME NO.82/2025 OF SULTHAN BATHERY EXCISE RANGE ON

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top